Mathematical Proof: Single Payer = “Good”
There has been much debate in the last few months over the Health Care Bills in Congress. Much of it, I’m afraid, has been more emotion and misconceptions than logic or truisms. Few that have gotten through high school can dispute certain mathematical truths that were drilled into them ad nauseum. One that we learn early on, is:
If A = B
and A = C,
Then B = C
Instead of ranting and raving illogically at various town hall meetings, let’s try using a little good old-fashioned logic (that we were all bored-to-death with in high school, but, let’s face it, can come in handy now and then).
Now consider the following statistics:
When asked in a new Harris Poll how strongly those polled support 14 different government services, five services receive strong, or a fair amount of support, from about three-fourths of all adults or more. The five most popular services are The National Parks Service (85% support), Crime-fighting and prevention services (77%) Medicare (76%), Social Security (76%), and Unemployment benefits (74%).
Medicare came in with a strong 76%, over 3 out of 4 people polled by Harris. (REMINDER: Medicare is a “single payer” system, with the government as the payee). I think it is safe to say that overall, Medicare is a success, and, if we can say that success is “good”, it logically follows that:
Medicare (A) = Single-payer System (B)
Medicare (A) = “good” (C)
then, Single-Payer System (B) = “good” (C)
Now, that wasn’t so painful was it?






It’s no secret about the enormous salaries, bonus, and benefit packages received by the top guys and gals in major U.S. corporations. Ex-Hewlett-Packard CEO Carly Fiorina comes to mind. She got a severance package worth about $21.4 million, but stood to get another $21 million after she was forced out by the company. Nice pay for messing things up royally (consider the logic of such packages: the board hires a CEO, gives them an incredible golden parachute. If they fail and are thrown out, they get rich. If they succeed, they get rich. What a Motivator!).
Geez, I never thought I’d have to resort to being an “image consultant”, but the republicans are becoming soo retarded in that respect that I just have to jump in. Take a look at the picture on the right. You probably know that you’ve seen him somewhere. You might think he’s one of those Wall Street guys, you know, the one that sold investors those flaky financial instruments that have brought down the worlds economy? Or, you might think he’s top sales guy for a men’s hair cream, or perhaps some activity director from a Cancun resort. Either way, your initial reaction to his looks is probably not a good one. We collectively hate Wall Street right now, the wet hair look is way out of date, and none of us can afford a trip to Cancun anymore. Also check out his suit. What would you guess, a $5k “outift”. Meanwhile we’re sewing patches on our jeans.
Christian Conservative Right, would you like to get back in the game?
So now that the Jeep is running and drivable we wanted to spruce the exterior up a bit. We thought a nice change in color was in order, and since we already have a white Jeep we decided to go with something a little more exotic, like, uh, yellow. After a bit of research we decided to get nasson paint since it is available at Carquest in any color combination. After some debate, and much asking of opinions, we ended up with a yellow that was one shade lighter then the Nissan Xterra color.
When we got the Jeep the transmission was slipping badly and was not drivable, because of this we wanted to rebuild a transmission we had pulled from our 88 Jeep Cherokee.
Recent Comments