Cash for Clunkers, a Flawed System.
By MaxW on Aug 1, 2009 in Auto, Environment, Featured, Rants & Raves, The Mud Pit

The Car Allowance Rebate System is a US federal program that helps US citizens to purchase a new, more fuel efficient vehicle when trading in a less fuel efficient vehicle.
Thousands of Americans are rushing out and trading in their old cars to receive a $3500 or $4500 discount towards the purchase of select new cars. This may sound great at first but there are many hidden facts the majority of the population may not be aware of.
- The program is designed to get old cars up to 25 years old with under 18 MPG off the road and replace them with brand new cars that have a higher MPG rating.
- Depending on the age of the vehicle you will ether qualify for $3500 or $4500 off of the purchase price of the new car.
- The old car must have been owned, registered, and insured for the past year.
- The dealer is required to disable the old cars engine by draining the oil and replacing with a water and silica solution, permanently destroying the engine.
- The old car must the crushed and the engine and drivetrain cannot be sold for parts, this prevents the sale of the car in the United States and elsewhere as a vehicle.
This video demonstrates the process of destroying the engine in the cars turned in using the Cash for Clunkers program. In the video the engine smokes, catches fire, and shoots oil on the ground, now that is good for the environment.
Many of the cars being turned in as “Clunkers” to this program are still perfectly fine and are being turned in just so the owner can get a new car, but because the car is required to be destroyed hundreds maybe even thousands of cars are being destroyed. But is this really the best way to get people to buy new cars? Why go to the effort to destroy perfectly fine cars that may only be 4-5 years old.
Let’s say all the cars that went to the program that were newer then say 1998 were taken into a low income car program, helping get the “real clunkers” off the road.
It could work as follows:
- The total household income is less then a certain level.
- Each household would qualify for only one vehicle trade.
- The traded vehicle must need more then $500 in repairs to qualify.
- The car must be less then 35 years old, but mileage does not matter.
- The car must be owned for the last year but is not required to be registered or smogged.
This would help get the “real clunkers” and unsafe cars off the road and help clean up the roads. But why was this not the way the Cash for Clunkers program was designed? We can only guess that it has to do with the fact that the Government has recently bailed out both GM and Chrysler. By requiring people to purchase a new vehicle they are protecting there investments.
Another theory about why they don’t want to have a low income program is “Keep Them Stupid and Poor” consperacy that has been floating around the internet. I think the government has been brainwashing the population, there is so many stupid laws and programs right now and the majority of the population appears to be going along with it.
I see this first hand as I am an unemployed, student. Like many others I have been in search of a job for many months, but because of the current economy there has been very little interest. Another major issue is the cut to education budgets, just this summer I had a class I was attending get canceled after the first week was over because they were two people short of the twenty person quota. I feel that as an American I am not getting what I should, if I pay my taxes I should be able to use that money, and I feel it unfair to allow this program to only benefit the people capable of making monthly car payments. What about the rest of the population?


dan rouse | Aug 1, 2009 | Reply
well, if you can’t make a monthly car payment then maybe you shouldn’t be concerned with getting a new car and more concerned with getting a job… have you been looking for any job? or just chilling out till you can find a job that is in your “field” why wait? why not find a piddly ass job and be working and paying taxes and looking for a good job in the meantime?
sage | Aug 1, 2009 | Reply
this is a bunch of junk, people are losing and looking for jobs so how the H are they going to make payments on a new one?? just another scam.
Pedantic | Aug 1, 2009 | Reply
It’s really hard to take anyone’s opinion seriously when that person can’t spell or use proper grammar in their “article.” Really, Max? You have some ideas about how the federal government should act? Maybe if you were educated beyond the fifth-grade level, someone, somewhere, will take you seriously. What a joke this so-called “article” is.
jerry | Aug 1, 2009 | Reply
Well youngster welcome to our future socialist society. Like social security and income taxes….those that contribute most get the least out of it. While those that contribute zilch get all the giveaways…..
NJ guy | Aug 1, 2009 | Reply
not sure about everyone else but doesent seem like there is anything wrong with the car they destroyed in that video. i am sure that there are plenty of other cars that NEED to be taken off the road.
Tim | Aug 1, 2009 | Reply
If our government can’t run a simple program such as this right do you really think they will be able to run a healthcare system?
dick | Aug 1, 2009 | Reply
You have not begun to plumb the depths of the debacle that is occurring. Generational theft and waste of epic proportions is occurring in the name of “solving” an economic crisis.
America will emerge a country of, for and by the government. Living standards will not decline, but the crushing burden of debt, taxes and government will permanently reduce growth. As the emerging world advances, the U.S. will slowly fall behind.
It is unfortunate that no one is speaking out. Good article.
fred | Aug 1, 2009 | Reply
Good job missing the point grammer nazis!
This guy pays taxes – and he is totally right to be annoyed that the government is using his taxes to give gifts to a small subset of the population. I totally agree with him.
-Fred
Harry Testecals | Aug 1, 2009 | Reply
The F 150 truck I TURNED IN HAD ABOUT 18 MILES PER GALON AVERAGE.
TOYOTA CANNOT DO THIS EVEN NOW WITH THERE TUNDRA.
CARS AND TRUCKS ARE WORST NOW THAN IN THE 1960′S
Sal | Aug 1, 2009 | Reply
I think they’re destroying the “clunkers” so that there will be less used parts available for the remaining vehicles on the street, thereby causing more people to buy the cars the government wants them to buy. Free market? What free market? Kiss it goodbye.