RSS Feed for This PostCurrent Article

How the U.S. Quality-of-Life Went Down the Shitter

The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society. Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country.
We are governed, our minds are molded, our tastes formed, our ideas suggested, largely by men we have never heard of. This is a logical result of the way in which our democratic society is organized.” – Edward Bernays

Life in America

bunny

THE HAND:  New World Order/”global elite”/Bilderberg Group/The Feds

THE CARROT:  “The American Dream”

THE BUNNY: would be us, the average American fool.

Who Is This Man Anyway?

225px-edward_bernaysBernays invented the public relations profession in the 1920s and was the first person to take Freud’s ideas to manipulate the masses. He showed American corporations how they could make people want things they didn’t need by systematically linking mass-produced goods to their unconscious desires.

Bernays was one of the main architects of the modern techniques of mass-consumer persuasion, using every trick in the book, from celebrity endorsement and outrageous PR stunts, to eroticising the motorcar.

His most notorious coup was breaking the taboo on women smoking by persuading them that cigarettes were a symbol of independence and freedom. But Bernays was convinced that this was more than just a way of selling consumer goods. It was a new political idea of how to control the masses. By satisfying the inner irrational desires that his uncle had identified, people could be made happy and thus docile.

“Keep ‘em Barefoot and Pregnant” Updated

Barefoot and pregnant” was originally associated with the controversial idea that women should not work outside the home and should have many children during their reproductive years.  I think this phrase has a new meaning,  and applies equally to men and women:  “barefoot” translates to “keep ‘em poor”, and “pregnant” translates to constantly “in labor” (pun slightly intended).  In other words, keep us rabble constantly in debt, so that we have to constantly work to stay above water, to provide money (or debt leverage) to constantly consume more products and services, that will keep us constantly in debt, that will keep us constantly working, etc. etc.  And so the wheels-of-hell turn.

Introducing the Bad Guys

And who is it that want’s to keep us “barefoot and pregnant”?  Well, to me, it’s not much of a stretch of the imagination to think that Corporate America LOVED Bernays’ ideas.  And so, with massive amounts of cash in hand,  was born our modern Madison Avenue.   To the rich and powerful, what part of “control the masses” is not to like?   And thus it came to pass, and their was born “advertising” in its many, and constant forms.  There’s probably more behavior-manipulating psychology going on in the dark recesses of Madison Avenue than in all the therapists offices across America.  Daily, hourly, minute-by-minute, second-by-second, advertisements, invading every little nook and cranny of our lives, playing on our secret and not-so-secret Freudian dreams and desires.

Corporations are all basically profit driven (stock has to keep going up after all, to keep stockholders happy, to keep the execs fat, to keep the stock going up, to keep …..).  To make this happen, they have to keep pushing their mass-produced crap to more and more consumers across the world (hence was born the “global economy” concept.  “Global Economy” is a nice benign term, itself hatched somewhere on Madison Avenue to make us think that a “global economy” is really a great thing – a world that has come together at last).  The truth is, the global economy came about about because pushing corporate junk to just Americans wasn’t enough;  it wasn’t keeping pace with their insatiable profit needs.  So now Corporate America has endeavored to entrap other innocent cultures (mostly third-world countries)  into their consumer-driven-wheel-of-hell, (and to add insult to injury, Corporate America exploits the countries cheap human and natural resources to boot!).

To government, esp. Republicans, this is all fine and good, since the growth of Corporations creates more jobs, which creates more taxes, which allows the officials currently in power to look good (not to mention, through greed and corruption, to get wealthy themselves).

ASIDE: Government wonks are just a necessary evil – they are the flunkies that go implement/enforce the various laws and financial policies (such as tax code, fiscal policy, etc.)  that shape the social manipulations dreamed up by the REALLY bad guys. Government wonks aren’t nearly wealthy enough to be major players as REALLY bad guys.  Read on.

Introducing the REALLY Bad Guys

If the above is halfway palletable, then it’s really not too much of a stretch to see that these corporate heads, media moguls, top government wonks, and financial kingpins, since they have common goals, wants and desires (get more wealthy, money, and power, respectively), might get together and form a “Good-Old-Wealthy-Boy-Club”  to perpetuate their agenda via a united front.  After all, two greedy MF’s are better than one.  How about 100 or more greedy MF’s from around the globe?

Many think that this club comes to us in the form of The Bilderberg Group, a mysterious group of weatlhy industrialists, financiers, top government officials, and wealthy family heads that meet regularly at various exclusive hotels around the world.  They remain very secretive, and their meeting places, agenda, etc. are always highly guarded.  When meeting, the security is like something you might envision if Obama were scheduled to walk down a street in Baghdad.  Unreal.  (for more detail, see a documentary on the topic called “Endgame”, and the theories, commentaries, etc of radio host Alex Jones).

Stair Steps to Hell

The barriers to a consumer society were therefore numerous and effective. To overcome them required changes in attitude and thought, changes in prosperity and standards of living, changes in commercial technique and promotional skills, sometimes changes even in the law itself. Above all it required the commercialization of society.

Neil McKendrik, John Brewer, J.H. Plumb, The Birth of a Consumer Society, (Hutchinson, 1983)

McKendrick et al continue to also point out that these changes were more than just processes in the world of advertising and selling, fashion and credit; it importantly touched things like:

  • Politics;
  • Commercialization of leisure;
  • of childhood;
  • Invention and creation
  • Economic, intellectual and social adjustments

The Campaign Began

In his book, Global Problems and the Culture of Capitalism (Allyn and Bacon, 1999), Richard Robins describes that for the rise of consumerism in the United States to occur, buying habits had to be transformed and luxuries had to be made into necessities. He describes numerous ways in which this was accomplished :

  • A major transformation in the meaning of goods and how they were presented and displayed. This included:
    • The evolution of the department store into a place to display goods as objects in themselves. Orchestras, piano players, flower arrangements, and so on would be used to “present goods in a way that inspired people to buy them. The department store became a cultural primer telling people how they should dress, furnish their homes, and spend their leisure time.” (p. 15, emphasis added)
    • Advertising was another “revolutionary development” to influence the creation of the consumer.
    • The idea of fashion would help in the “stirring up of anxieties and restlessness over the possession of things that were not ‘new’ or ‘up-to-date’. Fashion pressured people to buy not out of need but for style — from a desire to conform to what others defined as ‘fashionable.’”
    • Creation of, as well as improvement of service also helped. Customers were to be treated like guests. The adage of “the customer is always right” rings true here.
  • A transformation of the major institutions of American society, each redefining its function to include the promotion of consumption.
Education for example would be expanded from production/manufacturing knowledge to include things like accounting, marketing, sales, etc. Business schools popped up in many places.
  • Workers had to be given buying power in order to be able to create a consumer economy. This was accomplished via things like
    • higher wages
    • expanding consumer credit. An effect of this credit was to increase consumer debt, while creating mass markets for consumer goods that stimulated economic growth.

Around 2001, the issue of rising consumer debt in America was fairly constant news on the mainstream media, yet the habit of saving in comparison was rarely promoted!

On May 3, 2003, the Britain’s BBC aired a documentary titled “Spend Spend Spend” (a second of a three-part series, the first of which is mentioned further below). They looked at the issue of consumerism and credit, mostly in Britain, and is summarized here:

§ Side Note»»

Currently in many parts of the world, the level of consumption, in comparison is low. With “corporate-led” globalization, the fear is that these negative aspects of consumerism will be pushed throughout the world as well. What is not clear is the cultural resistance to this, and also how different cultures will also assimilate this with their own blend of consumerism, and whether or not the same problems would show up, or not, or if they would be different. Studies are slowly coming out on this aspect (some showing negative signs others showing signs of more choice and freedoms for people) and over time hopefully I will be able to highlight some of those here.

  • There had to be a “change in spiritual and intellectual values from an emphasis on such values as thrift, modesty, and moderation, toward a value system that encouraged spending and ostentatious display.”

Hmmmm.  Does the name “Tammie Fay” ring a bell.

Our So-Called ‘Life’

bf07

So, this incessant drive for us to earn more, consume more, spend more, has resulted in a frenetic daily life.  It has taken us away from the “June Cleaver” days where one spouse at least was allowed to stay home to take care of kids and a mired of other domestic issues.  (now days this could be either parent, just so somebody has it covered).   And it seems these issues have expanded exponentially,  with constant calls to correct billing mistakes, ward off telemarketers, taking in all the toys and crap we buy back for repair, or return, or to replace (since they intentionally have a shorter and shorter built-in obsolescence), and to tend to all the other millions of daily material and family demands.  Are lives a feverish, frantic attempt to “keep up”.  We have more “stuff”, but our life satisfaction level is rapidly approaching ground zero.

Those of us over 40 remember a different time.  It was different, and better.  The “June Cleaver” image is not so far fetched.  Many 40+ friends and family that I talk to agree that “something has been lost”, and they wish we could magically go back to those times.  Now, to remain above water economically, both spouses have to work (one wonders if this is part of the overall “bad guys” design.  One meager income for consumer spending has become insufficient.  Now we need two incomes to keep up the necessary, economically, politically and socially correct level of consumer spending).

So, how long will it be before we have to put the kids to work?  “Forget school today Johnny.  You have to hit the pavement to look for a job.  By the way, get your own breakfast today.  OK?  Dad and I are late for work”.

Trackback URL

  • Digg
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Fark
  • TwitThis

RSS Feed for This Post1 Comment(s)

  1. Bill | Jun 22, 2009 | Reply

    All true but without taking energy into the picture you can’t tell the whole story. You’ve read Orlov, right? How about the Olduvai theory and the decline in energy per capita since the 1979?

RSS Feed for This PostPost a Comment